<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Xen and KVM Discussion from Ian Pratt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2008/05/09/xen-and-kvm-discussion-from-ian-pratt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2008/05/09/xen-and-kvm-discussion-from-ian-pratt/</link>
	<description>Community Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 10:17:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: deshantm</title>
		<link>http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2008/05/09/xen-and-kvm-discussion-from-ian-pratt/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>deshantm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 19:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2008/05/09/xen-and-kvm-discussion-from-ian-pratt/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>OK good. that&#039;s what I thought it meant.

Also, don&#039;t forget that that the pv_ops dom0 support is coming soon too.

Some good follow up discussion can be found at these links:

http://www.virtualization.info/2008/05/xen-will-never-be-part-of-linux.html
http://blog.codemonkey.ws/2008/05/truth-about-kvm-and-xen.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK good. that&#8217;s what I thought it meant.</p>
<p>Also, don&#8217;t forget that that the pv_ops dom0 support is coming soon too.</p>
<p>Some good follow up discussion can be found at these links:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.virtualization.info/2008/05/xen-will-never-be-part-of-linux.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.virtualization.info/2008/05/xen-will-never-be-part-of-linux.html</a><br />
<a href="http://blog.codemonkey.ws/2008/05/truth-about-kvm-and-xen.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.codemonkey.ws/2008/05/truth-about-kvm-and-xen.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Spector</title>
		<link>http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2008/05/09/xen-and-kvm-discussion-from-ian-pratt/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Spector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2008/05/09/xen-and-kvm-discussion-from-ian-pratt/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Xen itself (the hypervisor) is not going to get merged into Linux. That’s pretty obvious anyway, and that is what is being said in the article. Guest support is included in recent 2.6 Linux kernels. That is, support for those Linux kernels to run as a paravirtualised guest on the Xen hypervisor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xen itself (the hypervisor) is not going to get merged into Linux. That’s pretty obvious anyway, and that is what is being said in the article. Guest support is included in recent 2.6 Linux kernels. That is, support for those Linux kernels to run as a paravirtualised guest on the Xen hypervisor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deshantm</title>
		<link>http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2008/05/09/xen-and-kvm-discussion-from-ian-pratt/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>deshantm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2008/05/09/xen-and-kvm-discussion-from-ian-pratt/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>The part that I was wondering about is about Xen not going into mainline LInux. Is that part dated information? Or has there been new developments that will not let Xen support go into mainline? Is it just referring to the hypervisor? domU and dom0 support are still in the works?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The part that I was wondering about is about Xen not going into mainline LInux. Is that part dated information? Or has there been new developments that will not let Xen support go into mainline? Is it just referring to the hypervisor? domU and dom0 support are still in the works?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)
Object Caching 267/271 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blog.xen.org @ 2013-05-19 10:16:48 -->