Skip to content


Response on Virtual Iron and Citrix Blog Discussions

I recently read a ZDNet article at http://blogs.zdnet.com/virtualization/?p=479 about some issues being taken by Virtual Iron with Simon Crosby’s statements. My response to the article is added as a comment and I wanted to make the community aware of my position. I believe that Simon’s comments were taken way out of context by the media who just love to “stir the pot” and the conclusions drawn in the article are a bit far fetched.

Please feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions or add comments to this blog posting. I truly believe that the Xen.org community is working well as new releases are occuring frequently and our “sold out” Xen Summit in Boston show a higher level of interest.


Be Sociable and Share!

Posted in Community, Xen.org Promotion.

Tagged with , .


2 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Stephen Spector says

    Simon and ZDNet had a conversation about the article and the response is here: http://blogs.zdnet.com/virtualization/?p=483. I encourage everyone to read this as it clears up the issues that ZDNet was discussing.

Continuing the Discussion

  1. virtual iron - StartTags.com linked to this post on January 26, 2010

    [...] a … Virtual Iron applications are developed in Java. This will make it easier for Oracle to …Response on Virtual Iron and Citrix Blog Discussions blog …I recently read a ZDNet article at http://blogs.zdnet.com/virtualization/?p=479 about some issues [...]

You must be logged in to post a comment.